The Issue of NoFollow in Random Theories
There have been so many questions left unanswered about the “nofollow” attribute, we call them theories. Even Matt Cutts tried to give a walk away short definition by referral of how he (or at least not Google) want us to see and understand about it in simple terms. This is a good try and I believe that the engineer had a hard time making this referral (LOL). The referral finally points here for those who do not have a complete understanding of how nofollow works and how to use it wisely and properly (at least).
Following what the Google engineer wrote in his blog, I can say there were really lots of juices that you guys out there who are pretty busy with the Busby SEO Challenge SEO contest can get out of this. This is what I’d like to call high in techie stuff and this is where we can get what we need to improve our performance in relation to the contest. Well, while running along, I also found that there were lots of important things to learn this year and one of them is different theories that were generated because of the lack of proper explanation by Google on how webmasters are to handle “nofollow”. You can read a lot of those famous nofollow theories here if only for more reference.
Finally finding what I really wanted about “nofollow”, here is what Google has to say to us and avoid the theories that were found lying in the web. This is where the juice ends and the truth (at least according to Google) lies regarding “nofollow”.
